AI DetectiveArticle 50(2) and C2PA overview →

Practical guide · authentic photography

How to prove a real photo is real with C2PA

A visible “real photo” caption proves nothing. A signed C2PA record can preserve a photo’s capture provenance from the source — if the workflow is built around it.

Most C2PA discussion starts with AI-generated images. There is a second, equally useful side: recording that a photograph came from a camera. For newsrooms, property listings, insurers, marketplaces and brands, that can make a real image easier to distinguish from a convincing synthetic one.

This is a technical guide, not legal advice. It explains what a C2PA digitalCapture record can show, and what it cannot.

A caption is a claim. A signed record is evidence.

Anyone can write “original photo” below an image, and ordinary metadata can be removed or altered. A C2PA Content Credentials record is cryptographically signed. It can state that an image was captured by a particular device or workflow, and it can record later edits without pretending the image is untouched.

The useful distinctiontrainedAlgorithmicMedia is used for AI-made content. digitalCapture is used when the source is a camera capture. The two are provenance statements about a particular file, not a machine’s guess about pixels.

Start at capture, not at publication

The strongest record begins as close as possible to the camera or ingest step. If a photographer exports a JPEG, sends it through several editors and only then adds a label, the later label cannot reconstruct the original capture history. It can only describe the point at which it was added.

For a working process, identify the first controlled point: a camera that supports Content Credentials, a phone capture workflow, a newsroom ingest service, or a trusted archive. Sign there, keep the original, and make later changes part of the record.

Editing does not make a photo “fake”

Crop, exposure correction, colour grading and retouching are normal production steps. C2PA is useful precisely because it can record these changes. The goal is not a simplistic “unedited” badge; it is an understandable chain: captured, then edited in these known steps.

That also means the workflow needs a decision for AI-assisted edits. If generative fill or an AI image tool materially changes a photo, record the tool and change honestly. Do not use a camera-origin claim to hide later synthetic work.

Test the copy the audience receives

A valid record in the original does not guarantee that it survives your CMS, image CDN, download service or social upload. Keep two files for the test: the signed source and the actual delivered copy. Check both, note the route and date, then fix the step that strips the record.

AI Detective’s free file check is a simple first check for supported image, video, audio and PDF files. For a repeatable record, use the same route a real user takes — not a convenient copy from an internal folder.

A small, practical capture checklist

Need to test a real-photo workflow?

We can map where the provenance record begins and where it drops out. The technical result is dated and evidenced; a lawyer can advise separately on legal questions.

Write to info@aidetective.eu or see a sample audit.